What?
Dilutive = money out (previous stakeholders cashing out)
Additive = money in (to company’s coffers)
What?
Dilutive = money out (previous stakeholders cashing out)
Additive = money in (to company’s coffers)
Will thousands of spying, interfering nanosats nullify China’s satellite killing missiles?
They wouldn’t think of preventing many statistically riskier parenting decisions so long as those decisions jive comfortably with social norms.
Source: Working Mom Arrested for Letting Her 9-Year-Old Play Alone at Park – The Atlantic
This problem is everywhere – social behaviour decisions, government policy implementations, day-to-day corporate decision-making. The reason, hinted at in the quote above, is two-fold:
Other potential reasons, I guess, are:
What can (should) be done to overcome these hurdles? (Other than defining regulation more rigidly to take decisions out of hands of people, and/or ‘educating’ people)
Came across my list of startups-to-watch from late 20111, while doing some spring cleaning yesterday. It was interesting to go back and see how the companies had fared over the 2-3 years since.
The Risers:
The Survivors:
The Pivotor:
The Acquired:
The Departed:
The list mostly conforms to my 3 key areas of interest in startups in 2011:
1st & 3rd were, and to an extent still are, areas that I looked at starting up something of my own if no good solutions emerged. While my itch on bringing business cards to the digital century has been slightly sated by CamCard, the TV itch continues unabated…
If you made similar lists, do share who was on it, and how they did. Might just make an interesting comparison.
And if you too have an itch to work on solving the TV interface problem, get in touch!
Learn what people are saying about your company on @reddit with a simple URL:
http://www.reddit.com/domain/[your-domain]
Example: Track any posts on reddit mentioning/linking Europe’s leading seed investment program here: http://www.reddit.com/domain/seedcamp.com
P.S.: If the scarcity of posts on that Seedcamp mentions page bothers you, get in touch with the program here: Wanted: Head of Content.
On Sunday, 12th Jan 2013, a Sherlock episode airs hinting at the key antagonist wearing a Google Glass like device, except it’s not in his glasses, but in his eye or in his contact lenses. 4 days later, Google publicly announces its Smart Contact Lenses project. Coincidence?
We don’t need smart TVs.
We need connected TVs with smart interfaces.– Aditya B
Note-to-self: Should explain this in more detail, with my vision of a good smart TV interface, once I’ve given up completely on the start-up project.
Apple is up today. More than Nasdaq or Dow Jones.
Is it because the market had already priced in Steve’s exit from the company?
Or is it a tribute to the man, who had modelled and trained the company so well in his image that the market expects innovation and success to continue unabated?
Have a look at the iPhone versions:
Is it possible that there the next iPhone won’t be an iPhone 5, but a mega product launched as iPhone 6? (In other words, iPhone 4S IS iPhone 5)
With $20 billion worth of inventory involved, I believe it’s more a case of Apple getting exclusive access to Sprint’s customers than Sprint getting exclusive rights to iPhone 5.
With such a huge inventory to push, I doubt Sprint will want to sport any high-end Android or WP phone for the next few years.