What?
Dilutive = money out (previous stakeholders cashing out)
Additive = money in (to company’s coffers)
What?
Dilutive = money out (previous stakeholders cashing out)
Additive = money in (to company’s coffers)
Today, at #CampusEdu on Startup Fund Raising, wasn’t the first time I’ve heard investors warn about being swindled by people who act like investors up front, but in reality are connectors who help you polish your offering and connect you to the real investors.
It’s valuable advice.
Founders are under pressure when raising funding, and a friendly, supportive facilitator can be a welcome presence. Specially, when he’s misrepresenting himself as an investor. The misrepresentation hurts more when either the promised funding gets delayed, or disappears, but even more when the facilitator takes a hefty cut before passing the funds on the startup, disrupting runway and plans.
On the other hand, the ‘connectors’ are not entirely to blame. Two factors, described below, actually create a valid market for them to cater to:
This mix of geographical and social barriers creates an opportunity for a kind of individual to facilitate fundraising for startups. And nothing good comes for free.
The problem here, it seems to me, is not that there are facilitators in the market, but that they are misrepresenting themselves as investors to gain credibility.
The solution, in my opinion, seems to be to legitimise them.
If the investors accept that there’ll always be segments of the market that could have really promising startups who may be struggling to each them for one of the reasons above, or others, there’s a way forward:
This helps bring the facilitator networks out in the open, makes their terms of engagement clear, and gives founders the confidence to engage them without them having to misrepresent themselves.
It’s an idea.
Continue reading Startup fundraising facilitators – Hazard to Help